Source: Composite image by G_marius
There are strong supporters and opponent of the austerity measures implemented during the crisis.
More austerity?
The European financial crisis and the challenges faced by the European currency countries have serve are justification to push forward austerity policies in most EU member states. In economics, austerity refers to policies used by governments to reduce budget deficits usually linked to adverse economic conditions. These policies include spending cuts and tax increases. Several countries, such as Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Spain, applied important austerity measures to redress difficult financial situations they underwent during the recent European sovereign-debt crisis. However, these austerity policies do not seem to have produced the same effects across countries. Some economists and policy-makers claim that more austerity is necessary in Europe, while others point at austerity measures as aggravating factors for the crisis.
If you change your mind, you can change your vote simply by clicking on another option.
New to netivist?
Join with confidence, netivist is completely advertisement free. You will not receive any promotional materials from third parties.
Join the debate
In order to join the debate you must be logged in.
Already have an account on netivist? Just login. New to netivist? Create your account for free.
You are viewing a filtered list of comments. Click the button above to view all comments.
1360 xp
344 posts
burden of proof, point me out to one service that people value that would be better served by a public system. also, there are numerous ways to provide medical assistance to those who cannot afford it that do not require having the government setting up the 'shop' and regulating the (monopolistic) 'market' that provides the 'service' e.g. allowing private hospitals to run tax-deducting foundations, providing credits for the use of private medical services etc.
1360 xp
344 posts
there are a million ways to provide medical coverage to those in need who cannot genuinely afford treatment, all of them more efficient, cost effective and clear cut eg. set aside a portion of the national budget to
1257 xp
247 posts
I don't believe that public system is systematically less efficient than private. And what about people with previous conditions? In a private system, if you already had some kind of disease, the insurance won't cover you, because you are more likely to have the same problem, or other medical problems related to this previous one. Or they make you pay enormous amount of money. Being sick is not the same as being a bad driver. It's not your fault (most of the time), so it's not fair to take only a private profit view on the subject.
Join the debate
In order to join the debate you must be logged in.
Already have an account on netivist? Just login. New to netivist? Create your account for free.
