In order to provide you with a better experience, netivist uses a limited amount of cookies. Learn more about the way we use them by reading our Cookies Policy. By continuing to browse netivist you are agreeing to our policy.

Driving age debate: what should be the minimum age requirement?

Channel:


driving age debate

We discuss if driving age should be increased in countries like the United States or maybe reduced in the areas with currently higher age requirements.

Cars are very practical means of transportation, almost a basic necessity in modern life, but driving them entails a great responsibility. According to the World Health Organization, approximately 1.24 million people died on the world’s roads in 2010. Almost 500 thousands in the two most populated countries of the world, China and India, and more than 35.000 in the US.

Many factors influence the rate of car accidents, such as the safety of the roads, cars' quality, traffic legislation (including monitoring and fines), and in particular, drivers' training and experience. Deciding the minimum age for a person to be able to drive is, thus, one of the most difficult decision the authorities face. The minimum age requirements varied across different countries, with some areas of the world allowing teenagers to drive with supervision at 14 and freely at 16, while in other countries you need to be 18 (or even 19 in the case of Gibraltar) to be allowed to drive a car by your own.

Driving age debate

In the countries where the driving age is very low (like the United States) there is a debate about if it would be better to rise the limit to 18.

  • Defenders of this position argue that teenagers are more responsible at 18, and also will get more experience driving with supervision a longer time. Car accidents are one of the main causes of deaths for teenagers, and rising the age limit could reduce mortality. Another argument in favor of public health is that teenagers with a car have more sedentary behaviors, which can increase obesity.
  • However, the opponents of increasing the minimum driving age argue that accidents and mortality are consequences of the lower experience of new drivers, and that rising the age requirement will only postpone these accidents. They also state that being able to drive younger helps teenagers be more independent, and allows them to help their family (shopping, bringing siblings to or from school, etc.).

In other countries, with a higher age requirement, there is a similar debate, about the possibility of reducing the driving age, with similar arguments.

A maximum age too?

Another question in the driving age debate is looking at the other extreme of the population, and ask if there should be a maximum age for elderly people. Eldery drivers are more prone to accidents. In many countries there are increased controls and medical checks for them, but not everywhere. In these case, the question is not to determine an age after which driving would be forbidden, but whereas the current controls are enough.

What is the driving age in your state or country? Do you think it should be reduced or increased? With previous training and appropriate practice, what should be the legal age to drive a car on your own without supervision? 

 

Driving age debate: what should be the minimum age requirement? Vote and tell us how you come to that conclusion.


Vote to see result and collect 1 XP. Your vote is anonymous.
If you change your mind, you can change your vote simply by clicking on another option.





Join the debate

In order to join the debate you must be logged in.



Already have an account on netivist? Just login. New to netivist? Create your account for free.





View all comments

You are viewing a filtered list of comments. Click the button above to view all comments.

...
Lvl 2
50 xp

48 posts
#52  |  Bjorn Milano  03 October 2024 @ 21:17

The specialize in cases as regards ETHICAL HACKING, CRYPTOCURRENCY, FAKE INVESTMENT SCHEMES and Funds RECOVERY . We are also experts in CREDIT REPAIR, we analyze what’s impacting your score.

I just have to testify about this here and let everyone know how much better I feel right now. I had over $790k in bitcoin Lost to a fake investor online that I came across last three mouths through a colleague of mine at work which also lost her investment along the line though she has been investing with the company for months too and been paid out severally before this happened tried reaching the team but did not get any feedback for several weeks, at some point I thought about getting a hacker to see if that will help and then I read about a team called Schwartz Software Hackers Services. They helped people retrieve their lost funds in investment or even stolen from their bank accounts. I reached out to him without hesitating and the outcome was wonderful. After retrieving the whole money he also worked for my colleague and is in the final stage of retrieving the last investment she made. Thank you for the heroic work you do for the helpless and hopeless. If you find it hard to reach him through email then contact him through telegram: https://t.me/schwartzsoftwarehackers

Email: schwartzsoftwarehackingprogram@gmail.com
Website; https://schwartzsoftwareha.wixsite.com/website


Join the debate

In order to join the debate you must be logged in.



Already have an account on netivist? Just login. New to netivist? Create your account for free.


Next Article